On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Mike Hearn <m...@plan99.net> wrote: >> This adds initial support for three new types of transactions: >> (a and b) >> (a or b) >> (a and b) or c > > Does this mean dispute mediation (2-of-3) will not be supported? I thought > the plan was also to allow CHECKMULTISIG for smallish numbers of keys.
The ease of omitting useful cases is why I was strongly supporting the full RPN boolean validation, even though it's harder to get good testing confidence. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
