Looks pretty reasonable to me. If Gavin changes the mainline client to use
this format I'll change BitcoinJ as well. It'll need a bit of API work so
clients are sure to set it up properly.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Amir Taaki <zgen...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0014
>
> Thanks to Gavin Andresen for proof reading and suggesting clarifications.
> Thanks to Patrick Strateman for suggesting the hierarchical format and
> pointing out some flaws of browser user-agents to me.
>
> The timeline is written in the past tense since BIPs are meant to be
> readable in the future for explaining why we took certain decisions with
> bitcoin. A nice cache for future historians when bitcoin is ubiquitous ;)
>
> The next version 0.6 should be the protocol version which becomes peeled
> off from the current client. There are still some changes migrating into
> the protocol that need to be finished.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> RSA(R) Conference 2012
> Save $700 by Nov 18
> Register now
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
