>
>
> I think it would be ideal if someone wanted to take up wxBitcoin. Maybe
> after
> backporting to wx 2.8...
>
Indeed, someone could do this if they're interested in it, in their own
fork. That's what I said too. But it's no longer our issue.
> > I don't think that has very high priority, and should probably not be in
> the
> > main project.
>
> Please be careful to avoid the centralization mindset. There is no "main
> project"; there is bitcoind, wxBitcoin, Bitcoin-Qt, MultiBit,
With the "main project" here I mean the issue list of bitcoin/bitcoin
project on github, which only deals with that project (and not that of the
forks, which have their own issue lists). You can argue the "main"-ness but
it's just a mailing list message and not some official document deciding
about the future of bitcoin, so I did not feel like specifying it to that
level of detail.
JS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
