On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Peter Vessenes <pe...@coinlab.com> wrote: > This is super cool! > > I have a feature request: it would be awesome to be able to provide private > keys at the command line with the signature, turning the client into a > wallet-less signature machine.
I like that idea. A third argument that is an array of private keys (in the same format as the dumpprivkey RPC call) should be easy to support, assuming the semantics are: + If third argument given, do not require that the wallet be unlocked, and only sign using the private key(s) given (ignore the bitcoind wallet entirely). + Private keys would stay in bitcoind memory only for the duration of the RPC call. -- -- Gavin Andresen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
