On Saturday, June 16, 2012 11:39:00 PM Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Gavin Andresen <gavinandre...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
> > RE: 0x06/0x07 'hybrid' public keys:
> >> Any opinions? Forbidding it certainly makes alternative implementation
> >> slightly easier in the future, but I'm not sure the hassle of a network
> >> rule change is worth it.
> > 
> > I say treat any transactions that use them as 'non-standard' -- don't
> > relay/mine them by default, but accept blocks that happen to contain
> > them.
> > 
> > I agree that a rule change isn't worth it right now, but making them
> > non-standard now is easy and should make a rule change in the future
> > easier.
> 
> ACK.  Hopefully no one will mine these before we can merge denying
> them into another rule change. But if they do, oh well.

I'm willing to make Eligius reject these as well, if someone provides a patch 
that doesn't depend on IsStandard being enforced...

Same goes for rejecting OP_NOP<n> - I can't see any legitimate reason we'd 
want these on mainnet right now.

Luke

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development

Reply via email to