On 2012 June 26 Tuesday, Pieter Wuille wrote: > Additionally, such addresses are exchanged and relayed via the P2P network. > To do so, we reused the fd87:d87e:eb43::/48 IPv6 range. Each address in
Yuck. Can't we pinch a few of the addr.services bits to store an address family? AF_INET, AF_INET6, AF_CUSTOM_TOR, and leave space for a few more would be, say, four bits out of 64 mostly unused. Andy -- Dr Andy Parkins andypark...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development