On 2012 June 26 Tuesday, Pieter Wuille wrote:

> Additionally, such addresses are exchanged and relayed via the P2P network.
> To do so, we reused the fd87:d87e:eb43::/48 IPv6 range. Each address in

Yuck.  Can't we pinch a few of the addr.services bits to store an address 
family?  AF_INET, AF_INET6, AF_CUSTOM_TOR, and leave space for a few more 
would be, say, four bits out of 64 mostly unused.


Andy

-- 
Dr Andy Parkins
andypark...@gmail.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development

Reply via email to