On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxw...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you had authored this as a pull request rather than making the > change unilaterally I would have recommended leaving it so the > reference client was always first. I also would have suggested that it > use JS randomization instead of jekyll in order to get more even > coverage, though I think thats a more minor point.
Agreed, and this would be why I support revert -- pull requests are for anything non-trivial. This practice of pull requests clearly should be followed in the case of controversial changes. > Some people were concerned when this page was created that it would > just be a source of useless disputes. I think its becoming clear that > this is the case. I think the cost of dealing with this page is > starting to exceed the benefit it provides and we should probably > consider removing it. Agreed. -- Jeff Garzik exMULTI, Inc. jgar...@exmulti.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
