On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:00:24AM +0100, Andy Parkins wrote: > > Increasing the resource usage by SPV clients on full nodes is undesirable; > > I don't think that's thinking big enough. What I imagine is that making it > easier and easier to store a partial blockchain would result in lower demand > on full nodes.
Read my proposal for "Partial UTXO" mode: http://www.mail-archive.com/bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net/msg02511.html > I might run a client that has only fetched blocks that contain transactions > needed to verify my balances, right back to the genesis block. That will be > some small subset of the block chain and will take me very little resource to > maintain. I join the network and am my client is willing to verify based on > information I have, or supply (by REST or bitcoin protocol) blocks. Imagine > then that everyone with a wallet were doing this. The blockchain would be > distributed massively. Obviously the miners would still be keeping the > entire > chain, but we'd have a lot more nodes in the network, each contributing a > little bit and so reducing the load on the full nodes. Actually the really scary thing about partial UTXO mode is miners can get away without keeping the entire chain provided they don't (often) try to mine transactions spending UTXO's that they haven't verified themselves. They can get away with accepting blocks without checking that the UTXO's exist, at least until enough miners do so that someone creates an invalid block and the majority of hashing power never notices. Remember that only with a complete UTXO set can you know that a UTXO *doesn't* exist. We're going to have to force miners to prove they possess the full UTXO set in the future or the security of Bitcoin will be seriously threatened. > > In any case UTXO data currently requires you to have full trust in > > whomever is providing you with it, and that situation will continue > > until UTXO commitments are implemented - if they are implemented. > > Almost; because you can go and ask someone else the same question, it's > pretty How do you know they actually are someone else? > easy to check if you're being lied to. Also, it's far easier to maintain a > headers-only block chain. When you fetch your relevant block subset, you can > easily see that they are real blocks in your headers-only blockchain; and so > it's pretty much impossible to lie to "give me the block containing > transaction X". Do you think you have SPV or full security in that situation? Do you know the difference? -- 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 0000000000000070f3d118303a611e1f44ea6482a3b59a16056e69af088b1ffa
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
