On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Douglas Huff <dh...@jrbobdobbs.org> wrote: > Honestly, until I read the quoted part of your response, I actually wasn't in > favor of this whole thing since in general the types of issues being > mentioned are, in large part, the types of issues that maintainers deal with > all the time. > > On Jul 23, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Scott Howard <showard...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Response: Is there a way to "certify" the Debian libraries? Debian >> bitcoind/bitcoin-qt runs the compile test during all architectures. >> MIPS has been failing recently, but no one has looked into it yet. >> Perhaps it's not worth developers efforts yet, but at some point the >> technology should reach a point it can be redistributed. > > > The fact that you're even trying to package and/or at some point have > packaged and shipped big endian binaries is straight up *NEGLIGENT.* > > Stop that. Now. It won't work. > > Thanks for showing that this *is* necessary, I guess.
before people get too upset, I'm talking about little-endian MIPS (debian-mipsel) http://www.debian.org/ports/mips/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
