On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:05:56PM +0200, Martin Sustrik wrote: > On 23/10/13 21:40, Peter Todd wrote: > > >The reference implementation is the specification - the "specification" > >on the wiki is best thought of as a set of Coles Notes on the real > >specification. If you don't already understand that and the nuance of > >that statement you should assume the protocol is fixed in stone and > >doesn't evolve at all; that statement is not quite true, but it's very > >close to the truth. > > Does that imply that the notes are deliberately obscured to force > everyone to check the source code?
What's on the wiki is mostly the work of people who aren't working on the reference implementation, so no, you can't say that. -- 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 0000000000000003c1d48b638b9857cb56b6fe9188a60c481fbc9b738ccb4663
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
