YYYY-MM-DD sorts more naturally.
On 04/05/2014 06:28 AM, Wladimir wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Matt Whitlock <b...@mattwhitlock.name > <mailto:b...@mattwhitlock.name>> wrote: > > On Saturday, 5 April 2014, at 12:21 pm, Jorge Timón wrote: > > I like both DD-MM-YYYY and YYYY-MM-DD. I just dislike MM-DD-YYYY > and YYYY-DD-MM. > > Your preferences reflect a cultural bias. The only entirely > numeric date format that is unambiguous across all cultures is > YYYY-MM-DD. (No culture uses YYYY-DD-MM, or at least the ISO seems > to think so.) > > > Let's not waste any time shed-painting this. I'd like to finish this > discussion at once: > > https://xkcd.com/1179/ > > Wladimir > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development -- Daryl Tucker da...@daryltucker.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
