On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Tier Nolan <tier.no...@gmail.com> wrote: >> This looks reasonable from a brief skim over, but does not define any use >> cases (it mentions "necessary for atomic cross chain transfers", but does >> not >> explain how it is useful for that - perhaps that belongs in another BIP >> you >> haven't written yet, though). > One use case should be enough. The atomic cross chain proposal has been > discussed for a while. It feels like bitcoin works on an "ask permission > first" basis.
You're reading that response the wrong way. It isn't in any way opposed to the specification, it's pointing out that the specification is _unclear_ about the applications, it mentions one but doesn't explain it and it wouldn't be apparent to all readers. Thats all. It could be clarified by saying something like "allows spending to be controlled by the publication of information, for example in another transaction so that they can only be completed atomically [citation to a revision of the contracts page]". ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform Build your Enterprise Intranet with eXo Platform Software Java Based Open Source Intranet - Social, Extensible, Cloud Ready Get Started Now And Turn Your Intranet Into A Collaboration Platform http://p.sf.net/sfu/ExoPlatform _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
