Is it more complex? The current implementation using template matching seems more complex than `if script.vch[0] == OP_RETURN && script.vch.size() < 42`
On 05/03/2014 12:08 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Mark Friedenbach <m...@monetize.io> wrote: >> I don't think such a pull request would be accepted. The point was to >> minimize impact to the block chain. Each extras txout adds 9 bytes >> minimum, with zero benefit over serializing the data together in a >> single OP_RETURN. > > In this case it's not a question extra txouts, its a question of > additional pushes. Assuming you didn't get the push overhead for free, > the only issue I see with that off the cuff is extra complexity in the > IsStandard rule... but really, why? Your application already needs to > define the meaning of the data— what point is there in making your > hash commitment less uniform with the rest of the network? > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
