Christophe Biocca wrote: > it becomes trivial with a few tries to split the network into two > halves: (tx1 before tx2, tx2 before tx1).
"before" implies T=0. That is a much too optimistic choice for T; 50% of nodes would misidentify the respend. > Tom Harding <t...@thinlink.com> wrote: >> - Eventually, node adds a consensus rule: >> Do not accept blocks containing a transaction tx2 where >> - tx2 respends an output spent by another locally accepted >> transaction tx1, and >> - timestamp(tx2) - timestamp(tx1) > T ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out: • 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity • Requirements for releasing software faster • Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
