On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 08:24:33AM +0200, Wladimir wrote: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:26 AM, Troy Benjegerdes <ho...@hozed.org> wrote: > > > If bitcoin wants to become irrelevant, then by all means, continue to > > depend on github and all the unknown attack surface it exposes. > > > > Those of us that do run our own servers will migrate to higher quality > > alternatives. > > So that means you're volunteering to run a web-accessible mirror of > the bitcoin repositories? > > Wladimir
http://bitspjoule.org/hg/upstream/bitcoin I guess I should update it more than every 6 months and then the updates won't take so long. It would also go a lot faster if I had a couple of dedicated servers, but that won't happen until I sell someone a support contract for crypto-commodities trading. I figure a bitcoin a month should support the hardware, 24x7 monitoring, and maybe a couple of full nodes running on the servers as well. And to pick up from another comment on this thread if you don't understand some of the differences between git and mercurial, or how to set up servers that pull from git and mirror to mercurial, you will have a lot harder time tracking down and removing malicous code that could get injected if someone gets root on a Github server. It is also a very usefull excercise in distributed systems design to understand how distributed revision control systems in theory converge to a coherent global state, and what is similiar or different to Bitcoin's global consensus model of what the balance of every bitcoin address is. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
