On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Peter Todd <p...@petertodd.org> wrote: > On another topic, I'm skeptical of the choice of nVersion==3 - we'll > likely end up doing more block.nVersion increases in the future, and > there's no reason to think they'll have anything to do with > transactions. No sense creating a rule that'll be so quickly broken.
Moderately agreed. Earlier in BIP 62 lifetime, I had commented on ambiguity that arose from bumping tx version simply because we were bumping block version. The ambiguity was corrected, but IMO remains symptomatic of potential problems and confusion down the road. Though I ACK'd the change, my general preference remains to disconnect TX and block version. -- Jeff Garzik Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
