On 6/1/2015 10:21 AM, Adam Back wrote: > if it stays as is for a year, in a wait and see, reduce spam, see > fee-pressure take effect as it has before, work on improving improve > decentralisation metrics, relay latency, and do a blocksize increment > to kick the can if-and-when it becomes necessary and in the mean-time > try to do something more long-term ambitious about scale rather than > volume.
What's your estimate of the lead time required to kick the can, if-and-when it becomes necessary? The other time-series I've seen all plot an average block size. That's misleading, because there's a distribution of block sizes. If you bin by retarget interval and plot every single block, you get this http://i.imgur.com/5Gfh9CW.png The max block size has clearly been in play for 8 months already. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
