That's a great idea and yes, we should continue to work on bugfixes and
improvements of the existing features! If anyone wants to help out, I'm
happy to review PRs.


On 05/17/2016 11:26 AM, Manfred Karrer wrote:
> Fixing or at least improving the bloomfilters would be very important
> IMO. I got shocked when I was reading the research papers regarding the
> bloom filters.
> I started to work on that in my branch but did not had time yet for a
> more in depth investigation.
> But fixing the most critical issues was pretty easy (though it needs a
> review and more time to be sure that it covers all edge cases).
> 
> Here is a summary of my changes as well as a call for devs to help to
> improve that:
> https://github.com/bitsquare/bitsquare/issues/414
> 
> Br,
> Manfred
> 
> 
> Am Dienstag, 17. Mai 2016 10:21:24 UTC+2 schrieb Andreas Schildbach:
> 
>     Two more ideas:
> 
>     - Proper reject message handling, feeding into transaction confidence.
> 
>     - Addr message handling, to reduce dependency on the DNS and HTTP
>     seeds.
> 
> 
>     On 05/14/2016 02:38 PM, Andreas Schildbach wrote:
>     > It's time to think about what we'd like to see in bitcoinj 0.15.
>     >
>     > Here are some initial ideas...
>     >
>     > - Finish the context refactoring. I recently (re-)discovered the plan
>     > laid out by Mike for this:
>     >
>     https://github.com/bitcoinj/bitcoinj/blob/master/designdocs/Contexts.md
>     <https://github.com/bitcoinj/bitcoinj/blob/master/designdocs/Contexts.md>
> 
>     >
>     > - Migrate the build to Gradle. The main compile should be pretty
>     > straightforward; but the gritty details are a bit hidden: protobuf
>     > generation, deploying to binary repos, authenticating dependencies
>     >
>     > - Segregated Witness. Nicolas Dorier started a branch for this,
>     > unfortunately it lost a bit of steam in the past weeks:
>     > https://github.com/bitcoinj/bitcoinj/pull/1171
>     <https://github.com/bitcoinj/bitcoinj/pull/1171>
>     >
>     > - Introduce a Payments API that takes a different view on
>     transactions.
>     > See this (preliminary) gist:
>     > https://gist.github.com/schildbach/a1c0c05e205baa229077
>     <https://gist.github.com/schildbach/a1c0c05e205baa229077>
>     >
>     > What do you think?
>     >
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "bitcoinj" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"bitcoinj" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to