Will bitcoinj reject larger blocks? On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 4:38:55 PM UTC+5:30, Andreas Schildbach wrote: > > As long as a fork does not change the proof of work rules, bitcoinj > makes no assumptions about forks. It will always select the chain with > the most work. > > What do you mean by "requesting an UTXO" and what do you want to achieve > by that? > > > On 03/14/2017 06:07 PM, Manfred Karrer wrote: > > If there would happen really a BU fork SPV wallets could get a > > connection to a majority of BU nodes and so a different view to the > network. > > Any plans or ideas how to deal with that? > > > > One idea would be to use a UTXO which is known to exist on only 1 chain > > request that and use that as a check to see which chain the node is > > operated on. > > If it is not the chain the wallet supports the node gets disconnected. > > > > Br, > > Manfred > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "bitcoinj" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > > an email to bitcoinj+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> > > <mailto:bitcoinj+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>>. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bitcoinj" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoinj+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
