Yeah, not much apparent interest at the moment, but hopefully that will change once we actually have something.
Well, rather than making a list of ideas, I did a refactoring to make things more modular. You can see it in Draft PR #1851 https://github.com/bitcoinj/bitcoinj/pull/1851 I'm planning on making a couple prototype apps using that refactoring as a base, so we'll see how well it works shortly. -- Sean On 5/11/19 8:46 AM, Andreas Schildbach wrote: > I've given a bit time for others to comment, but I'm afraid it seems > there is not much interest at the moment. However that could change as > soon there is something to show and be proud of. > > 1. and 3. sounds to me like it should go into a separate repo targetted > at JavaFX UI components and a reference wallet using these components. > If you'd like to have this with "bitcoinj developers" I can create it > for you and make you a maintainer. > > 2. sounds like the respective classes and packages of bitcoinj core > would be a good fit. > > Looking forward to your list of ideas! > > > On 01/05/2019 20.15, Sean Gilligan wrote: >> I have fairly ambitious plans (which are somewhat funding dependent) for >> making a JavaFX-based wallet framework as well as one or more wallet >> apps and I think that framework encompasses a larger scope (e.g. Omni >> Layer) than bitcoinj. So I'll probably create a repository under >> ConsensusJ for the full effort. >> >> However, I would like to do as much of the work as possible "upstream" >> at bitcoinj. I would like to see at least two or three gradle submodules >> (either in the main bitcionj repo or in a separate one): >> >> 1. JavaFX wallet components >> 2. Non-JavaFX wallet components (e.g. 12/24 word support utils, etc.) >> 3. wallet-template (or a sample wallet) >> >> I'm personally a fan of using fewer repositories where possible so that >> refactoring, integration/functional tests work more smoothly. (Though we >> could make the effort setup dependent CI builds, etc.) >> >> I'll try to brainstorm a list of existing and new components that I have >> in mind over the next few days. >> >> I'm hoping others will respond as I'd love to see a real community >> effort around bitcoinj on JavaFX. >> >> -- Sean >> >> >> On 4/30/19 1:46 PM, Andreas Schildbach wrote: >>> I'm breaking out the discussion from >>> https://github.com/bitcoinj/bitcoinj/pull/1780 >>> and >>> https://github.com/bitcoinj/bitcoinj/issues/1819 >>> to here for everyone to participate. >>> >>> For me, wallet-template always was not much more than an example, being >>> in its own subproject only for the reason that Mike wanted to use the >>> latest Java language features, JFX, etc. >>> >>> Sean would like to develop it more into a library of reusable wallet >>> components, also UI components as far as I understand. >>> >>> I think if that's the goal, it should probably live in its own >>> repository and use its own versioning. (The repo could still be under >>> the "bitcoinj" group if that's desired.) >>> >>> On the other hand, there is the argument that by trying out >>> wallet-template, bitcoinj core is being tested. Of course that's also >>> the case if you use wallet-tool, or any of the other examples, or most >>> importantly the unit tests. >>> >>> So what's your opinion on it? >>> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bitcoinj" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoinj+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoinj/d3fd4a6b-b82c-8d7d-f941-1afa0a3db893%40msgilligan.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
