Hi  @Andreas Schildbach

Can you help please ?

On Friday, 5 July 2019 12:17:04 UTC+5:30, Kunal Ransing wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please check below log. We used bitcoinj-0.14.7
>
> 2019-07-04 07:08:52,316 INFO  [BTCConfig] (EJB default - 3) 
> BTCConfig_sendCoin[null]:Amount[0.00100000],CAddress[
> mjfk9eH6bL3kWB2rxCvEpVeebh3Re2qHNq]
> 2019-07-04 07:08:52,470 INFO  [BTCConfig] (bitcoinj user thread) BTCConfig
> :Received tx for 0.18099586 BTC:   
> 1a27cdb394e9b8700315931d434fdddd1d048c830e55ea113937f5c6657e933c
>   updated: 2019-07-04T07:08:52Z
>      in   PUSHDATA(71)[
> 30440220671380ce916eea30e963ec8321795b38f40a7eda7307dd840b8134b8d24c43de02203555cada51f267afb9bdf04babd846d8f5d9ca9e25ebf158a3d9778af3f30f7e01
> ] PUSHDATA(33)[
> 02e38ebbaf270bffa495b4289886c3a9797ecd1395edf6c3ff64a442f542077217] 
> 0.18104586 BTC
>           outpoint:
> bdc18f7bd931976853435f52ad8cce3670b3a656f1f8315ce72a2e5cfdd63bbf:1 hash160
> :3cb538db83e92d4e6213331a38324042f8fed0b5
>      out  DUP HASH160 PUSHDATA(20)[
> 2d8a1bd06754b28a4a408235997beffc5314f5ad] EQUALVERIFY CHECKSIG 0.001 BTC
>      out  DUP HASH160 PUSHDATA(20)[
> c1acb7a6d334990cec9a1a0c59d1bd7fbc2ac845] EQUALVERIFY CHECKSIG 0.17999586 
> BTC
>      fee  0.00022222 BTC/kB, 0.00005 BTC for 225 bytes
>      prps USER_PAYMENT
>
>
> 2019-07-04 07:08:52,470 INFO  [BTCConfig] (bitcoinj user thread) 
> BTCConfig_updateTxResult:Receivedtx[
> 1a27cdb394e9b8700315931d434fdddd1d048c830e55ea113937f5c6657e933c] of 
> block depth[0] for amount[0.18099586 BTC] foraddress[
> mjfk9eH6bL3kWB2rxCvEpVeebh3Re2qHNq]
>
>
>
> On Thursday, 4 July 2019 19:14:21 UTC+5:30, Andreas Schildbach wrote:
>>
>> Can you post the toString() of the transaction in question? 
>>
>>
>> On 04/07/2019 15.22, Kunal Ransing wrote: 
>> > We have a wallet that has many testnet addresses, We tried performing a 
>> > "Send" Transaction from one address to another (Within same Wallet). 
>> > Q1. We found that the sent amount did not match the receiving amount. 
>> We 
>> > this feature is a necessity, Could you please mention drawbacks of this 
>> > approach? 
>> > Q2. Is there any way that will return all Addresses generated under 
>> > particular Wallet? 
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> > Groups "bitcoinj" group. 
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>> > an email to bitc...@googlegroups.com 
>> > <mailto:bitc...@googlegroups.com>. 
>> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> > 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoinj/52da624b-9b97-471f-8cdb-29f47ff95bae%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> > <
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoinj/52da624b-9b97-471f-8cdb-29f47ff95bae%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>>  
>>
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>>
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"bitcoinj" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to bitcoinj+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoinj/d5d761fd-9eb3-4b1c-895f-0b7a968a6e67%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to