why?
> There are things that I like to compile and things I dont
> like to compile. SsH is a decnet, i mean decent, thing to comile in
> my book.
>
>
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, [iso-8859-1] daniel j shahin wrote:
>
>> hmm. I suppose, but by that logic everything should be not just
>> compiled, but code audited for security too. I'm far too lazy for
>> that action...
>>
>> d$
>> > Yah, that's what i said, but i got all this flak from MikeG and Sach
>> > about how you _must_ compile your own SSH implementation _from
>> > scratch_.
>> >
>> >
>> > -Lkb
>> >
>> > On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, [iso-8859-1] daniel j shahin wrote:
>> >
>> >> or you could install the package(s) from:
>> >>
>> >> http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/sparc/
>> >> or
>> >> http://www.sunfreeware.com
>> >>
>> >> much simpler.
>> >>
>> >> d$hahin
>> >>
>> >> > Hey, sun blueprints actually has an article on how to compile and
>> >> > install openssh on solaris using gcc!
>> >> >
>> >> > http://www.sun.com/blueprints/0701/openSSH.html
>> >> >
>> >> > Guess you didn't have to write it after all Mike! :-)
>> >> > -Lkb
