No, it seams to me that this whole thing, and similiar trends, ala DMCA ties in quite nicely with that whole second amendement thread we were having before. ;)
sach On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, [iso-8859-1] daniel j shahin wrote: > but this would only effect gifs, probably not jpegs, and certainly not pngs, > right? pngs are cooler too, does anybody know whether the major browsers > all support them, (including the alpha channel capabilities)? > > d$ > > > > > This is very frightening. Check it out: > > > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/21948.html > > > > E > > > > -- > > > > Erik Curiel > > Sometime Web Engineer/Almost Philosopher > > > > "sheepdog standing in the rain > > bullfrog doing it again > > > > some kind of happiness > > is measured out in miles > > > > what makes you think you're something special > > when you smile > > > > > > childlike no one understands > > jack knife in your sweaty hands > > > > some kind of innocence > > is measured out in years > > > > you don't know what it's like > > to listen to your fears > > > > > > you can talk to me > > you-can-talk-to-me > > you can talk to me > > > > if you're lonely > > you can talk to me" > > > > -- /* Sach Jobb [EMAIL PROTECTED] %s/windows/linux/g */ "As far as i'm concerned the two biggest hassles in the world revolve around DNS and girlfriends." -- (name undisclosed to protect the innocent)
