Any sidebets that the patch itself introduces vulnerabilities? Maybe, even juicier, that the advisory is a social enginerring ploy, and the patch itself is malware?
tack On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Marc Majcher wrote: > > jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > : > :mmm... anyone wanna start a pool on when the first worm shows up? > > Anyone want to bet that there isn't already one, and malicious code is > sitting on a whole mess of machines, waiting to hatch? > > > DVS > > _______________________________________________ > Bits mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.sugoi.org/mailman/listinfo/bits > -- ------------------------------------------ I recommend a slow, steady gorging process, combined with assal horizontology. - Dr. Nick Riviera <a href="javascript:while(true){alert('[EMAIL PROTECTED]');}">My spam email address</a> _______________________________________________ Bits mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sugoi.org/mailman/listinfo/bits
