Anything I can do..let me know.
Henry
=================================
Henry L.Coleman [www.VoIP-PBX.ca]
Tel: 647-723-5160 Ext.203
=================================
{ Bill Sandiford}
> Keith:
>
> I think the community as whole will be able to help in a few ways. I have a
> conference call tomorrow with
> the regulatory folks from a few other CLECs and ISPs to discuss this some
> more. One of the things we will
> be discussing is the best strategy to with regards to grass roots support.
>
> Off the top of my head I believe the strategy will be different for the
> different proceedings. For the
> petitions to the Governor in Council I believe the best plan of action will
> be writing a detailed letter
> to your local MP. Telnet has offices in 3 federal ridings, and we have
> actually made appointments to
> speak to the members of parliament from all 3. In the case of Whitby we
> actually have Flaherty himself as
> an MP, so that was a difficult one to get an appointment for but we managed.
> For the Bell UBB tariff
> filing the best bet will be to file an intervention with the CRTC.
>
> I'll give the community some more details after my conference call tomorrow
> (Wednesday).
>
> Thanks for the offer of support, we are going to need all the support we can
> get.
>
> Regards,
> Bill
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Major | Aquarius Telecom Inc. [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 2:02 PM
> To: Bill Sandiford; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [biz] Various regulatory issues that could affect you
>
> Thanks Bill,
>
> What can we do to help?
>
>
> Keith Major
> Network Engineer & Business Development
> Aquarius Telecom Inc.
> www.aquariustel.com
> 416.800.0833 ext. 1005
>
> Hosted PBX Services & Business VoIP Solutions
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not
> waive any related rights and obligations.
> Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it
> contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized.
> If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or
> otherwise) immediately.
>
> Ce courrier électronique est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne
> renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent.
> Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements
> qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s)
> désigné(s) est interdite.
> Si vous recevez ce courrier électronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser
> immédiatement, par retour de courrier électronique ou par un autre moyen.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Sandiford [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: March 30, 2009 1:57 PM
> To: 'asterisk Mailing'; '[email protected]'
> Subject: [biz] Various regulatory issues that could affect you
>
> All:
>
>
>
> I apologize in advance for the cross-posting between lists, however I felt
> this was of significant enough importance to justify it (hopefully Simon and
> Dave agree with my assessment). I suggest that any discussion of this topic
> take place on the general list ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>).
>
>
>
> There is a lot of regulatory proceedings going on right now. These
> proceedings are actually what is taking up the most of my time these days.
> The most important of which are the following
>
>
>
> http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/sf09316.html
>
>
>
> We are opposing the Bell and Telus petitions and supporting the Allstream
> petition.
>
>
>
> Bell is basically petitioning Governor in Council to overturn CRTC decisions
> that they don't like. There are huge implications to this, especially in
> these few cases.
>
>
>
> But more importantly Bell has recently filed a tariff notice for what is
> known as UBB (Usage based billing)
>
>
>
> http://www.crtc.gc.ca/8740/eng/2009/b2_7181.htm
>
>
>
> UBB will force wholesalers (like Telnet, Teksavvy, and others) to enforce 60
> GB/month caps on our subscribers and bill for usage above 60GB. Bell is
> asking the CRTC for this to be effective May 31, 2009. As you will see from
> the link above, Telnet (in association with some others) have already filed
> a letter with the CRTC asking that interim approval of this tariff not be
> granted as we plan to intervene and fight this tariff.
>
>
>
> Have a read of the files in the links.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Bill Sandiford
> Telnet Communications
> 905-674-2000 x100
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message is intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information
> that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable
> law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and
> delete the message. Thank you.
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.30 - Release Date: 26/03/2009
> 12:00 AM
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
