I have a similar request to the one below, only the customer is in Toronto, they want a 50 seat install of Asterisk, no Linux capable staff, please email me for contact info, thanks, Mark.
-----Original Message----- From: saurin ajmeri [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 10:52 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [biz] Client in Niagra Falls - Email found in subject Hi Everybody, I have client who wants to setup voip for his medical building in Niagara Falls. Please drop me a email if you would like to provide service in Niagara Falls. Please reply with some details about your business and i will forward you his contacts details. Thanks, Saurin On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Bruce N <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think Cogeco is the only provider who comes close to what you might > want but they operate more to the west of Toronto (I mean cities west > of Toronto). > 50Mbps download - Upload unknown - I haven't tested it though but $99 > sounds fine. > http://www.cogeco.ca/cable/on/en/residential/internet/hsi/explore_hsi. > html > > > -Bruce > > > > Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:51:10 -0600 > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [on-asterisk] Asterisk & 1 Gigabit Internet. > > > > The root problem is lack of competition. We have no competition > > because under our foreign ownership regime, Canada does not allow any. > > > > > Unfortunately the CRTC are not helping matters, their board > > > consists of > ex Bell and Cable people who are very conservative; to the point of > choking off any competition before is viable. > > > > I'm not a big fan of the CRTC for a lot of reasons but on this > > particular issue I always feel I have to defend them. The fact is, > > the CRTC was taking steps to increase competition and one of the > > first things the Conservatives did when they came to power in 2007 > > was order them to stop. > > > > Here is a nice little article in an archive that explains just how > > ticked off the bureaucrats at the CRTC were at the Conservatives > > (conform or quit): > > > > > http://www.pugetsoundradio.com/cgi-bin/forum/Blah.pl?v-print/m-1170784 > 107/ > > > > And an original story from the CBC that explains what the government > > did and how happy the incumbents were: > > > > http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2006/06/13/crtc.html > > > > The Conservatives have also not lifted the foreign ownership > > restrictions in Telecom despite several bi-partisan reports that > > recommended they do so. As recently as this November, Tony Clement > > announced they would not be allowing competition (foreign owned > > companies) in Canadian Telecom any time soon. > > > > So on this one, it's squarely in the hands of the politicians, not > > the > CRTC. > > > > Not to promote my own blog on this list but I've written extensively > > on competition, deregulation and the CRTC including a whole post on > > the favorite Canadian sport of bashing the CRTC for everything: > > > > > http://www.johnlange.ca/2008/07/16/apparently-the-crtc-is-to-blame-for > -everything/ > > > > -- > > John Lange > > www.johnlange.ca > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional > > commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Confidentiality Note This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. Thank you. Avis sur la confidentialité Ce courriel est transmis au destinataire pour ses propres fins. Il pourrait contenir des renseignements confidentiels ou soumis au secret professionnel selon les lois applicables. Si vous n'êtes pas le véritable destinataire, ou son/sa mandataire, il est strictement interdit de diffuser ce courriel, les renseignements qu'il contient ou les documents qui lui sont joints. Si vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur immédiatement et veuillez le supprimer sans le lire, l'imprimer, le sauvegarder ou le diffuser. Merci de votre aimable collaboration. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
