Certainly SOME Search Engines will give good results where the domain name
contains multiple words - Of course, the site neds to be "active" and been
indexed by the search robots for it to be found - with good meta keywords
and text in the home page as well it should get a very high rating.

However, purely as a single name for a site - I wouldn't rate it that
highly - but in combination with other names (Yes, you can point multiple
domain names at a single website) names like this one have a place in a
website's marketing campaign.

Len Thomson
L.A. Consulting Ltd
Auckland
New Zealand

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Patrick Corliss
Sent: Friday, 29 September 2000 18:07
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Low-Cost-Domain-Names.com - "smart" browsers


Martyn Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> if you find a mug willing to pay $ 2,500 for low-cost-domain-names.com
> please let me know as i'd split the profit with you on

Hi Martyn & List

Although I was able to come up with other alternatives very quickly, that's
because the longer the string, the easier it is.  Pure mathematics - a
30-character string with 27 possibilities for each character (alpha &
hyphen) is a real big number.

So on that basis the name's not worth much.

But not all of those possibilities make sense in English "cost-low" is not
so good as "low-cost" for example.  That also cuts out about 99% of the
random strings.

More interestingly is the effect of a "smart browser".  From my own
programming experience I'd suggest that low-cost-domain-names.com might
resolve (I suppose you can say that) better that lowcost-domainnames .com.

Anybody known anything about how "smart browsers" work?  This definitely
affects the resale value of domain names.  Think from a sales viewpoint.
Would the user type generic words into the subject-line of their browser?
Does the browser recognise spaces or hyphens?  How does it resolve?

Any information would be appreciated.

Regards
Patrick Corliss



Reply via email to