I'd
put forth that having public mailing lists that we provide to allow open and
honest discussion is one of the factors that sets us apart.
Charles Daminato
OpenSRS Product Manager
Tucows Inc. -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----Thanks for the responses to my bringing up this subject. Essentially what I gather is that some people feel that Tucows is a White Hat organization while others feel that Enom is a cesspool. There are disagreements about the veracity of both sides but neither has given any facts to support either position. So that brings me back to my original question of What distinguishes Tucows these days from Microsoft or Verisign?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 6, 2002 10:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 2 more Q's- Affiliate/Mirrors
Saying that they are ethical is an opinion. Showing in what way (what would be useful for me and others) is what I'd like to hear if possible. Because an organization started out one way does not mean it has remained true.
I would consider working with a good organization a benefit and I'd probably pay more to do so. But everyone says they are good guys - even Microsoft has their evangelizers and I've seen people shill for large companies on newsgroups before. "Ethical business practices" is great but in real life what are specific examples of this?
Getting past the mudslinging and forgetting about enom for the moment, what is so great specifically about Tucows/OpenSRS? I don't want to start any futher flaming. I'd just like to know if anyone has any specific examples from present day? Anecdotal stuff such as about spamming or not spamming is not really a specific example unless specifics are provided.
