--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Black Focus Inc." group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Black-Focus-Inc?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

--- Begin Message ---
On opposite sides of fence

<HEDLINE><HL2>Estuary advocate, once a collaborator, now  at odds 
<BYLINE>By Leslie Be
<BYTTL>STAFF - SD UNION TRIBUNE  
August 25, 2008  
SOUTH COUNTY – In the fall of 1990, an  environmental activist from Imperial 
Beach received a presidential award at the  behest of his congressman.  


PEGGY PEATTIE / Union-Tribune
Mike McCoy, an environmental activist from Imperial  Beach, lost his legal 
battle against a new border fence project championed  by Rep. Duncan Hunter 
that 
McCoy says could threaten the Tijuana River  estuary.


PEGGY PEATTIE / Union-Tribune
Spray from a water truck knocked down dust at the  border fence project area 
near the San Ysidro Port of  Entry.
Mike McCoy was being honored with a  Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Award, 
at the time presented by Republicans for  stewardship of the environment. The 
congressman who nominated him was Duncan  Hunter.  
The Democratic veterinarian and the Republican congressman, who at the time  
represented Imperial Beach, didn't see eye to eye on everything, but they 
agreed  on a surprising number of issues. There was sewage entering the Tijuana 
River  estuary, and McCoy was working with Hunter's staff to clean it up.  
A friendship of sorts emerged from their unlikely alliance. Once upon  
returning from Washington, Hunter gave McCoy, who chaired his environmental  
committee, a copy of a sketch drawn by Ronald Reagan of one of Hunter's sons.  
“Thanks, McCoy,” he dedicated it.  
Fast-forward almost two decades, and the one-time collaborators are at  
opposite ends of a long-running controversy over a new border fence and the  
eventual fate of the estuary.  
Their disagreement is in a sense a conflict of life legacies. McCoy, 66, has  
dedicated the bulk of his life's work to preserving the estuary. Along with  
other environmentalists, he led the losing legal battle against a plan to 
build  a double fence across a deep canyon known as Smuggler's Gulch.  



The  massive project, already under way, requires filling the canyon with so 
much  dirt that the California Coastal Commission ruled four years ago that it 
could  damage the estuary, increasing silt erosion and destroying sensitive 
wildlife  habitat.  
Hunter, 60, the former chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, is  
best known for promoting border security as an antidote to illegal immigration. 
 
He has been the project's strongest proponent, introducing legislation three  
years ago that waived all laws hampering fence construction.  
“Mike McCoy is a good guy,” said Hunter, who retires in January. “People of  
good will can look at exactly the same set of facts and come to opposite  
conclusions.”  
The two maintain a mutual respect from afar, but they haven't spoken in  
years. McCoy blames their parting of ways chiefly on the fence.  
“I think he saw me as an obstacle,” he said recently.  
McCoy is familiar with being in this position. In the early 1970s, the  
then-recent transplant from Colorado got wind that Imperial Beach city leaders  
planned to develop the wetlands south of town into a marina.  
The estuary was by no means pristine, its northern end used as a dumping  
ground. The City Council argued that a marina would help the cash-poor city.  
It was the only sizable estuary on the Southern California coast still  
untouched by development, and McCoy felt strongly that developing it would 
cause  
greater harm than proponents understood.  
“The fisheries of the world rely on estuaries,” he said. “In my mind, it was 
 criminal to destroy it.”  
For close to a decade, he and others campaigned to block the marina, and in  
late 1980, the estuary was protected. It is now known as the Tijuana River  
National Estuarine Research Reserve.  
Also that year, Hunter won the congressional district seat that included  
Imperial Beach. Though not what one would call a tree-hugger, Hunter had  
concerns about raw sewage from Tijuana spilling into the ocean, as did  
constituents. 
 
“In rainy weather, sewage from Tijuana was getting into the Tijuana River,”  
he said recently. “It was going into the estuary.”  
McCoy was an advocate for cleaning it up, and though he hadn't voted for  
Hunter, he volunteered to work with him on the sewage issue.  
“He was definitely helpful to me,” McCoy said of his association with 
Hunter.  “Until we got into this border fence thing.”  
Common ground
At first, the two agreed on the idea of a border fence to  stem illegal 
immigration traffic through Imperial Beach. From Hunter's point of  view, the 
fence 
would keep undocumented migrants and drug smugglers out of the  country. From 
McCoy's, it would keep the estuary from being hammered by foot  traffic.  
Starting in the late 1980s, Hunter's staff set about locating used military  
landing mat for Army welders to fashion into a metal fence.  
“It worked pretty well,” said McCoy, who supported the first fence. “It cut  
down traffic by around 90 percent.”  
McCoy said he has since had second thoughts, especially after tighter  
enforcement policies in 1994 drove migrants east to the desert.  
“People died out there,” he said. But at the time, “from our little point of 
 view, it shifted the traffic.”  
His support for Hunter's plans had begun to wane by the mid-1990s, after  
Hunter became a proponent for legislation calling for layers of fence extending 
 
14 miles inland.  
Under the new plan, Smugglers' Gulch would be filled with more than 2 million 
 cubic yards of dirt to build a half-mile, 165-foot-tall earthen bridge  
supporting fencing and roads.  
A series of revisions came and went over several years as advocates pushed  
for a more environmentally sensitive plan, but nothing was agreed upon.  
In early 2004, McCoy's organization, Southwest Wetlands Interpretive  
Association and other groups sued the federal government.  
Getting the waiver
For Hunter, the process had been an exercise in  frustration.  
“It became clear that we would never get permission,” he said. “So we wrote  
the waiver language into the Real ID Act.”  
The purpose of the Real ID Act of 2005 was to impose federal security  
standards on state identification cards. Hunter added language that would allow 
 the 
Homeland Security secretary to supersede laws stopping fence construction.  
In September 2005, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff set a  
precedent by waiving the laws on which the San Diego lawsuit was based; the  
lawsuit 
later was thrown out of court.  
A $48.6 million contract for the project was awarded this year.  
For Hunter, who lives in Alpine and leaves Congress after an unsuccessful bid 
 last year for the Republican presidential nomination, it's the achievement 
of a  goal that became a personal crusade.  
“The security of the country is the primary interest,” he said. “In carrying 
 out that interest, the environment can be accommodated.”  
Hunter said ponds and structures can arrest silt that results from the  
operation. McCoy hopes there will be such protections but isn't confident.  
His best hope, McCoy said, is that if the fence comes down some day, what  
damage occurs can be repaired. He also has given quite a bit of thought to the  
fences he once thought were a good idea.  
“If people want to come here, they are going to come,” he said. “I see it as 
 a barrier that needs to lead to a solution. That's the only way I can face 
it.”  
 
____________________________________
Leslie Berestein: (619) 542-4579; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])  



**************It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel 
deal here.      
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047)

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To post: / Para enviar mensajes: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: / Para dejar el grupo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Page in English: http://groups.google.com/group/hispanic-usa?hl=en
Pagina en espanol: http://groups.google.com/group/hispanic-usa?hl=es
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to