--- Begin Message ---
soc.veterans
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.veterans?hl=en
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Today's topics:
* If McCain goes for Palin the election is over - 16 messages, 6 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.veterans/browse_thread/thread/b54651119f74c755?hl=en
* WTC-7: EMERGENCY WARNING !!! - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.veterans/browse_thread/thread/17dd8a9a4bad2b33?hl=en
* klaus the dumbest shit we've ever seen here (Re: McCain's immigration report
card.) - 4 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.veterans/browse_thread/thread/47b69972ee0634dd?hl=en
* dumbass scout is lost (Re: Number of U.S. Military Personnel Slaughtere) - 1
messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.veterans/browse_thread/thread/cce74cc47e08927e?hl=en
* Romney. Pawlenty, and Lieberman refuse.... - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.veterans/browse_thread/thread/0e88c0275b6598da?hl=en
* McCain chooses Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin for V.P - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.veterans/browse_thread/thread/3cb4f8114537a296?hl=en
==============================================================================
TOPIC: If McCain goes for Palin the election is over
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.veterans/browse_thread/thread/b54651119f74c755?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 16 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:11 am
From: Paulie Walnutts
On Aug 29, 11:09 am, "Der Komissar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm the youngest of six. Large families are a regressive thing of the past.
>
> "Gogarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > says...
> >>I just read up on her background. She has FIVE children, and gave birth
> >>to
> >>a Down's Syndrome baby just this past April. I find it hard to reconcile
> >>taking on a demanding role as VP with being able to take care of your
> >>family, especially a newborn special-needs child. Sexist, yes, but face
> >>it,
> >>women still bear the brunt of childcare.
>
> > Not when they can afford platoons of nannies.
>
> > And hey! Don't knock a woman with five children. I am the eldest of five.-
> > Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Tell that to the 50 million illegal mexxkins in the U.S now.
== 2 of 16 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:12 am
From: John
On Aug 29, 8:36 am, Verwoerdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> McCain wins in a mini landslide.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>When she gets done touring the major
> universities in this country the intelligent young men and women will
> come over in droves to the Republican side.
And what will she tell them? "I'm younger than Obama?" THAT will win
them over?
>She'll also get more of
> the Hillary vote than you can imagine
Because she's a women? You have such a low opinion of women that you
think they'll vote for McCain because he has a woman on the ticket?
I've found that the women in my life have been thoughtful and
intelligent and looked at the issues each candidate had before pulling
the lever--whether there was a woman on the ballot or not. But, of
course, I'm talking about liberal women--the ones who don't do
whatever their spouses tell them to.
>or at least more than if
> Pawlenty or Romney where the picks.
She will also lead the movement to reform the Republican party and
bring it back to the way it use to
> be lead by Reagan.
McCain is the head of the ticket, not Palin. How does she reform the
party?
>I smell trouble in Obamaville.
They're too busy laughing and congratulating Obama on his victory in
November.
>Could it be the
> messiah's time has run out with this pick, we shall see. I know I'm
> more excited than ever knowing she might be the VP and she'll rally
> the base.
You didn't even know who the Governor of Alaska was before yesterday
and you're crowning her as the Messiah?
>It's lights out time for Obama and after this lose
I assume you meant "loss" and you realize that this pick by McCain
guarantees that Obama wins. What a dumb pick.
>his
> career in Presidential poltics will come to an abrupt end because it
> will be Hillary's turn next. The democrats worse fear is a female on
> McCain's ticket.
But a female with some experience, some leadership, something to
really offer the nation as a breath of fresh air. This pick does
nothing but add Dan Quayle-light to the McCain ticket.
>Let the games begin.
This is gonna be fun.
== 3 of 16 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:12 am
From: Paulie Walnutts
On Aug 29, 11:10 am, "Der Komissar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nope. Should have been smart enough to plan her pregnancies better in the
> first place. I personally would not have supported aborting that child.
>
> Try again, loser.
>
> "Hugh Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Aug 29, 9:49 am, "Der Komissar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > I just read up on her background. She has FIVE children, and gave birth to
> > a Down's Syndrome baby just this past April. I find it hard to reconcile
> > taking on a demanding role as VP with being able to take care of your
> > family, especially a newborn special-needs child. Sexist, yes, but face
> > it,
> > women still bear the brunt of childcare.
>
> > "Barack Is Ready" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> > messagenews:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > "Verwoerdon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> McCain wins in a mini landslide. When she gets done touring the major
> > >> universities in this country the intelligent young men and women will
> > >> come over in droves to the Republican side. She'll also get more of
> > >> the Hillary vote than you can imagine or at least more than if
> > >> Pawlenty or Romney where the picks. She will also lead the movement
> > >> to reform the Republican party and bring it back to the way it use to
> > >> be lead by Reagan. I smell trouble in Obamaville. Could it be the
> > >> messiah's time has run out with this pick, we shall see. I know I'm
> > >> more excited than ever knowing she might be the VP and she'll rally
> > >> the base. It's lights out time for Obama and after this lose his
> > >> career in Presidential poltics will come to an abrupt end because it
> > >> will be Hillary's turn next. The democrats worse fear is a female on
> > >> McCain's ticket. Let the games begin.
>
> > > Yep, we're shakin' cause she'll be out having babies every 9 months
> > > since
> > > she's anti-choice.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> See. It's already started. She'll be beat to a bloody pulp by the
> kooks because she has a newborn "special needs" child. They'll be
> saying she should've aborted the blob of protoplasm before it became a
> fetus and a burden.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Plan her pregnancies?? You think she has'nt figured out where babies
come from?? She's NOT a liberal FFS !!
== 4 of 16 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:13 am
From: reality
On Aug 29, 9:42 am, "tvor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Der Komissar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Idiot. Ever hear of BIRTH CONTROL??? Even natural family planning.
>
> > She was stupid to get pregnant.
>
> why is getting pregnant stupid?
It's stupid for a woman over 40 to get pregnant since the incidence
for Down's increases from 1 in 1,000 for women under age 35 to 1 in 40
for women over age 40.
"Risk Factors
Pregnancy in females under age 16 or over age 35. Risk increases with
mothers age. At age 40, incidence is 1 in 40 births."
http://www.rxmed.com/b.main/b1.illness/b1.1.illnesses/DOWN%20SYNDROME.htm
== 5 of 16 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:15 am
From: Paulie Walnutts
On Aug 29, 12:13 pm, reality <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 29, 9:42 am, "tvor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "Der Komissar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > Idiot. Ever hear of BIRTH CONTROL??? Even natural family planning.
>
> > > She was stupid to get pregnant.
>
> > why is getting pregnant stupid?
>
> It's stupid for a woman over 40 to get pregnant since the incidence
> for Down's increases from 1 in 1,000 for women under age 35 to 1 in 40
> for women over age 40.
>
> "Risk Factors
> Pregnancy in females under age 16 or over age 35. Risk increases with
> mothers age. At age 40, incidence is 1 in 40 births."
>
> http://www.rxmed.com/b.main/b1.illness/b1.1.illnesses/DOWN%20SYNDROME...
Thanks for the info Doctor. She should've consulted you before having
sex !!
== 6 of 16 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:15 am
From: Jerry Kraus
On Aug 29, 9:36 am, Verwoerdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> McCain wins in a mini landslide. When she gets done touring the major
> universities in this country the intelligent young men and women will
> come over in droves to the Republican side. She'll also get more of
> the Hillary vote than you can imagine or at least more than if
> Pawlenty or Romney where the picks. She will also lead the movement
> to reform the Republican party and bring it back to the way it use to
> be lead by Reagan. I smell trouble in Obamaville. Could it be the
> messiah's time has run out with this pick, we shall see. I know I'm
> more excited than ever knowing she might be the VP and she'll rally
> the base. It's lights out time for Obama and after this lose his
> career in Presidential poltics will come to an abrupt end because it
> will be Hillary's turn next. The democrats worse fear is a female on
> McCain's ticket. Let the games begin.
Well, I agree the election's over. McCain just lost. Women won't
vote for an anti-choice woman. And she brings no States into McCain's
electoral camp. Obama takes New York,California and Illinois
automatically. Biden gives him Pennsylvania. Game over. Suicidal
choice by McCain.
== 7 of 16 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:16 am
From: reality
On Aug 29, 8:01 am, 4657 Dead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:55:16 -0400, "James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >"Barack Is Ready" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in messagenews:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> "Verwoerdon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> McCain wins in a mini landslide. When she gets done touring the major
> >>> universities in this country the intelligent young men and women will
> >>> come over in droves to the Republican side. She'll also get more of
> >>> the Hillary vote than you can imagine or at least more than if
> >>> Pawlenty or Romney where the picks. She will also lead the movement
> >>> to reform the Republican party and bring it back to the way it use to
> >>> be lead by Reagan. I smell trouble in Obamaville. Could it be the
> >>> messiah's time has run out with this pick, we shall see. I know I'm
> >>> more excited than ever knowing she might be the VP and she'll rally
> >>> the base. It's lights out time for Obama and after this lose his
> >>> career in Presidential poltics will come to an abrupt end because it
> >>> will be Hillary's turn next. The democrats worse fear is a female on
> >>> McCain's ticket. Let the games begin.
>
> >> Yep, we're shakin' cause she'll be out having babies every 9 months since
> >> she's anti-choice.
>
> >Nothing wrong with that. Anything else?
>
> Yeah. Who the fuck is Palin?
A hail mary pass from a desperate man.
== 8 of 16 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:21 am
From: "tvor"
"reality" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 29, 9:42 am, "tvor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Der Komissar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Idiot. Ever hear of BIRTH CONTROL??? Even natural family planning.
>
> > She was stupid to get pregnant.
>
> why is getting pregnant stupid?
It's stupid for a woman over 40 to get pregnant since the incidence
for Down's increases from 1 in 1,000 for women under age 35 to 1 in 40
for women over age 40.
"Risk Factors
Pregnancy in females under age 16 or over age 35. Risk increases with
mothers age. At age 40, incidence is 1 in 40 births."
http://www.rxmed.com/b.main/b1.illness/b1.1.illnesses/DOWN%20SYNDROME.htm
Well, I'm guessing that she doesn't regret having her child and doesn't
think it's stupid. And that's pretty much all that matters.
== 9 of 16 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:24 am
From: reality
On Aug 29, 10:15 am, Paulie Walnutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 29, 12:13 pm, reality <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 29, 9:42 am, "tvor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > "Der Komissar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
> > >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > Idiot. Ever hear of BIRTH CONTROL??? Even natural family planning.
>
> > > > She was stupid to get pregnant.
>
> > > why is getting pregnant stupid?
>
> > It's stupid for a woman over 40 to get pregnant since the incidence
> > for Down's increases from 1 in 1,000 for women under age 35 to 1 in 40
> > for women over age 40.
>
> > "Risk Factors
> > Pregnancy in females under age 16 or over age 35. Risk increases with
> > mothers age. At age 40, incidence is 1 in 40 births."
>
> >http://www.rxmed.com/b.main/b1.illness/b1.1.illnesses/DOWN%20SYNDROME...
>
> Thanks for the info Doctor. She should've consulted you before having
> sex !!
Ever hear of condoms or birth control pills? Even the Catholic
Church's whacked out views on birth control don't affect most
Catholics, who give the Pope the finger and use them anyway.
== 10 of 16 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:26 am
From: "Der Komissar"
I don't want someone who can't even plan a family being a heartbeat away
from the presidency. How is she goona take care of this kid responsibly
when she will arguable have the second most critical job in the world?
"tvor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "reality" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Aug 29, 9:42 am, "tvor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Der Komissar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > Idiot. Ever hear of BIRTH CONTROL??? Even natural family planning.
>>
>> > She was stupid to get pregnant.
>>
>> why is getting pregnant stupid?
>
> It's stupid for a woman over 40 to get pregnant since the incidence
> for Down's increases from 1 in 1,000 for women under age 35 to 1 in 40
> for women over age 40.
>
> "Risk Factors
> Pregnancy in females under age 16 or over age 35. Risk increases with
> mothers age. At age 40, incidence is 1 in 40 births."
>
> http://www.rxmed.com/b.main/b1.illness/b1.1.illnesses/DOWN%20SYNDROME.htm
>
>
>
> Well, I'm guessing that she doesn't regret having her child and doesn't
> think it's stupid. And that's pretty much all that matters.
>
>
>
== 11 of 16 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:27 am
From: "Der Komissar"
She should have had the brains to take precautions. Getting pregnant over
40 is risky.
"Paulie Walnutts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 29, 12:13 pm, reality <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 29, 9:42 am, "tvor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "Der Komissar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > Idiot. Ever hear of BIRTH CONTROL??? Even natural family planning.
>
> > > She was stupid to get pregnant.
>
> > why is getting pregnant stupid?
>
> It's stupid for a woman over 40 to get pregnant since the incidence
> for Down's increases from 1 in 1,000 for women under age 35 to 1 in 40
> for women over age 40.
>
> "Risk Factors
> Pregnancy in females under age 16 or over age 35. Risk increases with
> mothers age. At age 40, incidence is 1 in 40 births."
>
> http://www.rxmed.com/b.main/b1.illness/b1.1.illnesses/DOWN%20SYNDROME...
Thanks for the info Doctor. She should've consulted you before having
sex !!
== 12 of 16 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:28 am
From: "Der Komissar"
I agree. And she should stay home and take care of her special-needs child.
> Well, I'm guessing that she doesn't regret having her child and doesn't
> think it's stupid. And that's pretty much all that matters.
>
>
>
== 13 of 16 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:39 am
From: "tvor"
"Der Komissar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I agree. And she should stay home and take care of her special-needs
>child.
>
>
A woman's place is in the kitchen, right? How do the feminists of your
party feel about that attitude?
>> Well, I'm guessing that she doesn't regret having her child and doesn't
>> think it's stupid. And that's pretty much all that matters.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
== 14 of 16 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:40 am
From: "Der Komissar"
She should stay home and take care of the baby then, instead of handing it
over to nannies. Typical Rephuke hypocrisy.
"Plan her pregnancies?? You think she has'nt figured out where babies
come from?? She's NOT a liberal FFS !!"
== 15 of 16 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:41 am
From: reality
On Aug 29, 10:39 am, "tvor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Der Komissar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >I agree. And she should stay home and take care of her special-needs
> >child.
>
> A woman's place is in the kitchen, right? How do the feminists of your
> party feel about that attitude?
So if you are going to be irresponsible and not use birth control over
the age of 40, then have a Down's child that is highly dependent on
its mother for love and support, then in the republican mind it's OK
to abandon it and fly all over creation campaigning for an adulterous
old letch?
== 16 of 16 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:49 am
From: "tvor"
"reality" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 29, 10:39 am, "tvor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Der Komissar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >I agree. And she should stay home and take care of her special-needs
> >child.
>
> A woman's place is in the kitchen, right? How do the feminists of your
> party feel about that attitude?
So if you are going to be irresponsible and not use birth control over
the age of 40, then have a Down's child that is highly dependent on
its mother for love and support, then in the republican mind it's OK
to abandon it and fly all over creation campaigning for an adulterous
old letch?
Why do you so easily dismiss her husband?
==============================================================================
TOPIC: WTC-7: EMERGENCY WARNING !!!
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.veterans/browse_thread/thread/17dd8a9a4bad2b33?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:18 am
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Al Dykes)
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
optix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:08:53 -0700 (PDT), Möbius Pretzel
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>This is really scary.
>>
>>With this latest revision of our understanding of the universe
>>by NIST
>>I will never enter a steel-framed building again.
>>
>>And neither should anyone else...
>>
>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7U22m9xLrQ
>
>
These k00ks hide behind Web pages and YouTube videos to make their
claims. They refuse to speak in public with other people with relevant
expertise
Nobody with relevant expertise believes what they post on the interned.
They won't address polite, relevant questions.
Why should anyone believe them?
--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:40 am
From: optix
On 29 Aug 2008 13:18:03 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Al Dykes) wrote:
>
>These k00ks hide behind Web pages and YouTube videos to make their
>claims. They refuse to speak in public with other people with relevant
>expertise
>
>Nobody with relevant expertise believes what they post on the interned.
>
>They won't address polite, relevant questions.
>
>Why should anyone believe them?
Wrong again Dykes.
http://www.ae911truth.org/
Scroll down a little on the left hand side, look for the (free)
streaming video:
Part I: "WTC Building #7 – A controlled demolition?" (45 min.)
Parts I & II – "WTC Building #7 and Twin Towers – Controlled
Demolitions?"
(2 hours)
-----------------------
Shortly after 9/11, Bin Laden was being publicly blamed by BushCo.
Bin Laden released a statement to the press:
" I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States
nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government
within a government within the United States. The United States should
try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the
people who want to make the present century a century of conflict
between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked
as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is totally
in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United
States."
This statement was broadcast in the foreign news media. Bush ordered
the US news media to blackout this statement because he was afraid of
Bin Laden transmitting secret orders to "terrorist" cells in the US.
Yeah right. Fact is, the most dangerous terrorist cell in America is
being run from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.....
--
Anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities has the power to make
you commit injustices.
Voltaire
==============================================================================
TOPIC: klaus the dumbest shit we've ever seen here (Re: McCain's immigration
report card.)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.veterans/browse_thread/thread/47b69972ee0634dd?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:23 am
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Once again for the right wing troll:
Hey asshole goober, if I post the names will you apologize for your
constant right wing ignorance and shut up?
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/29/2008
at 06:59 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>In talk.politics.guns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>>Hey asshole goober, if I post the names will you apologize for your
>>constant right wing ignorance and shut up?
>So now you're saying you'll only tell the truth if you get a reward?
>[chuckle]
>No WONDER everyone considers leftists to be social deviants.
>________________________________
>Truth Teller's Lies
>LIE 1 "Bush signed the agreement."
>LIE 2 "Bush 'has to sign' the agreement.
>LIE 3 "I never lied"
>LIE 4 "I said Bush signed the agreement to work on the agreement" LIE 5
>"Other people can sign docs w/ the authority of the President." LIE 6 "I
>never said the atomic bombing was justified."
>LIE 7 "Bush hasn't been in Iraq"
>LIE 8 "The draft has been signed."
>LIE 9 "Parts of the draft has been signed."
>LIE 10 "The draft agreement is now final"
>LIE 11 "They're finished with the draft agreement"
>LIE 12 "provisions ... were signed as progress was made"
>LIE 13 "the draft is done, and on its way to Washington."
>LIE 14 "I can post the names ... who say the draft is done" LIE 15
>"The prime rate hit 21.5% under right wing reagon" LIE 16 "Klaus said it
>was a private conversation"
>LIE 17 "It's the President's job to enforce the law"
>LIE 18 "I found the names"
== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:23 am
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Once again for the right wing troll:
Hey asshole goober, if I post the names will you apologize for your
constant right wing ignorance and shut up?
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/29/2008
at 07:00 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>In talk.politics.guns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/29/2008
>> at 06:44 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>>
>>
>>>In talk.politics.guns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/29/2008
>>>> at 04:37 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude <kschadenfreude @comcast.net> said:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>In talk.politics.guns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/28/2008
>>>>>> at 06:49 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude <kschadenfreude @comcast.net> said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In talk.politics.guns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Stop trolling and take your meds goober.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>TRANSLATION: Truthteller wants me to stop reminding him that he's a liar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Stop trolling goober. You lost the game a long time back.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And yes asshole, the names of the iraq based negotiators were published
>>>>>>with their comments on how the draft agreement was progressing. Its your
>>>>>>problem that you are too stupid to use google.
>>>>
>>>>>You probably couldn't find them if your life depended on it.
>>>>
>>>>>>Of course you have also told us there was no agreement
>>>>
>>>>>There is no agreement.
>>>>
>>>>>"Intense negotiations between US and Iraqi officials are nearly completed
>>>>>on an agreement"
>>>>>http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/opinion/2008/0829/1219875239462.html
>>>>
>>>>>Now, see how that works? I made a claim, I backed it up with a verifiable
>>>>>cite.
>>>>
>>>>>Are you saying there *is* an agreement? Because if you are, you're a
>>>>>liar. And you know what lying does- it makes your list longer. [chuckle]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hey asshole goober, if I post the names will you apologize for your
>>>>constant right wing ignorance and shut up?
>>>>
>>>>But you lack the balls to do that -- because you areno-body nothing who is
>>>>tolling here for attention. -- Its a common mental defect you right
>>>>wingers share.
>>>>
>>
>>>Post the names and prove you're not a liar, fuckwit. Then you can work on
>>>your other lies...
>>
>>
>>
>>Thanks for PROVING you are here to troll and lie, right wing asshole
>>klaus.
>>
>Thanks for PROVING that you're a liar. Let me know if you EVER figure out
>how to post a verifiable citation, willya?
>Of course, by that time, the sun will have gone nova.
>________________________________
>Truth Teller's Lies
>LIE 1 "Bush signed the agreement."
>LIE 2 "Bush 'has to sign' the agreement.
>LIE 3 "I never lied"
>LIE 4 "I said Bush signed the agreement to work on the agreement" LIE 5
>"Other people can sign docs w/ the authority of the President." LIE 6 "I
>never said the atomic bombing was justified."
>LIE 7 "Bush hasn't been in Iraq"
>LIE 8 "The draft has been signed."
>LIE 9 "Parts of the draft has been signed."
>LIE 10 "The draft agreement is now final"
>LIE 11 "They're finished with the draft agreement"
>LIE 12 "provisions ... were signed as progress was made"
>LIE 13 "the draft is done, and on its way to Washington."
>LIE 14 "I can post the names ... who say the draft is done" LIE 15
>"The prime rate hit 21.5% under right wing reagon" LIE 16 "Klaus said it
>was a private conversation"
>LIE 17 "It's the President's job to enforce the law"
>LIE 18 "I found the names"
== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:23 am
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You agreee to shut up for a month if I post them goober? I want to see
if you have the balls to be a real man for once?
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/29/2008
at 03:41 PM, "Scout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> Hey asshole goober, if I post the names <snip>
>Hell you couldn't post the names before, so what makes you think you can
>post them now?
>IF you had the names you would have already posted them.
>So asking him this question is sort of like asking someone:
>If gravity stopped what would you do?
>In short a hypothetical question of an impossible event.
== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:23 am
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So you are too stupid to find them too. Well how about this goober: I
post them and you agree to not post for a month? Got the balls little
boy, or will you troll anyway?
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/29/2008
at 03:42 PM, "Scout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for PROVING you are here to troll and lie, right wing asshole
>> klaus.
>So much for posting the names............
>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/29/2008
>> at 06:44 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>>
>>
>>>In talk.politics.guns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/29/2008
>>>> at 04:37 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude <kschadenfreude @comcast.net> said:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>In talk.politics.guns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/28/2008
>>>>>> at 06:49 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude <kschadenfreude @comcast.net> said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In talk.politics.guns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Stop trolling and take your meds goober.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>TRANSLATION: Truthteller wants me to stop reminding him that he's a
>>>>>>>liar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Stop trolling goober. You lost the game a long time back.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And yes asshole, the names of the iraq based negotiators were published
>>>>>>with their comments on how the draft agreement was progressing. Its
>>>>>>your
>>>>>>problem that you are too stupid to use google.
>>>>
>>>>>You probably couldn't find them if your life depended on it.
>>>>
>>>>>>Of course you have also told us there was no agreement
>>>>
>>>>>There is no agreement.
>>>>
>>>>>"Intense negotiations between US and Iraqi officials are nearly
>>>>>completed
>>>>>on an agreement"
>>>>>http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/opinion/2008/0829/1219875239462.html
>>>>
>>>>>Now, see how that works? I made a claim, I backed it up with a
>>>>>verifiable
>>>>>cite.
>>>>
>>>>>Are you saying there *is* an agreement? Because if you are, you're a
>>>>>liar. And you know what lying does- it makes your list longer. [chuckle]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hey asshole goober, if I post the names will you apologize for your
>>>>constant right wing ignorance and shut up?
>>>>
>>>>But you lack the balls to do that -- because you areno-body nothing who
>>>>is
>>>>tolling here for attention. -- Its a common mental defect you right
>>>>wingers share.
>>>>
>>
>>>Post the names and prove you're not a liar, fuckwit. Then you can work on
>>>your other lies...
>>
>>>________________________________
>>>Truth Teller's Lies
>>
>>>LIE 1 "Bush signed the agreement."
>>>LIE 2 "Bush 'has to sign' the agreement.
>>>LIE 3 "I never lied"
>>>LIE 4 "I said Bush signed the agreement to work on the agreement" LIE 5
>>>"Other people can sign docs w/ the authority of the President." LIE 6 "I
>>>never said the atomic bombing was justified."
>>>LIE 7 "Bush hasn't been in Iraq"
>>>LIE 8 "The draft has been signed."
>>>LIE 9 "Parts of the draft has been signed."
>>>LIE 10 "The draft agreement is now final"
>>>LIE 11 "They're finished with the draft agreement"
>>>LIE 12 "provisions ... were signed as progress was made"
>>>LIE 13 "the draft is done, and on its way to Washington."
>>>LIE 14 "I can post the names ... who say the draft is done" LIE 15
>>>"The prime rate hit 21.5% under right wing reagon" LIE 16 "Klaus said it
>>>was a private conversation"
>>>LIE 17 "It's the President's job to enforce the law"
>>>LIE 18 "I found the names"
>>
==============================================================================
TOPIC: dumbass scout is lost (Re: Number of U.S. Military Personnel Slaughtere)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.veterans/browse_thread/thread/cce74cc47e08927e?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:23 am
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
No asshole I did not that assertion. goober klaus did. Now stop your
idiot lying.
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/29/2008
at 03:38 PM, "Scout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
>>
>> Run along asshole. I did not make the statement you are whining about.
>> Your troll buddy klaus did.
>>
>> Now learn to correct your stupidity and shut up.
>Oh, what a LIE.
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You told us it was between you and
>another. That means you think its a private conversation asshole.
>It is YOUR assertion that he thinks it is private, which means the
>privacy issue is YOUR assertion. Not his.
>>
>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/29/2008
>> at 03:39 AM, "Scout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/29/2008
>>>> at 12:43 AM, "Scout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>>>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Goober, learn how usenet works. It will be better then making an idiot
>>>>>> out
>>>>>> of yourself everyday here.
>>>>
>>>>>Why are you talking to yourself?
>>>>
>>>> Why are stupid goober? Were you born this way or does it come and go
>>>> like
>>>> hot flashes?
>>
>>>Do you really ask yourself these sort of questions?
>>
>>>Sad, really.
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>> PS: Anyone who has a conversation in a public place and expects
>>>>>> privacy
>>>>>> is a complete IDIOT.
>>>>
>>>>>So, why do you expect a conversation between yourself an Klaus to be
>>>>>PRIVATE?
>>>>
>>>> Were you born this stupid, or do you come here to work on it? -->You
>>>> see
>>>> asshole, I have never said one word about "expecting" a public
>>>> conversation to be private
>>
>>>No, you just said that a conversation between 2 people was
>>>private.....even when held in public. That makes you, by your own
>>>admission, a total idiot.
>>
>>>So, I can see why you ask yourself those questions.
>>
>>>Sad, really.
>>
>>
>>
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Romney. Pawlenty, and Lieberman refuse....
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.veterans/browse_thread/thread/0e88c0275b6598da?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:27 am
From: John Galt
Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
> "Sid9" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in alt.politics.bush:
>
>> Romney. Pawlenty, and Lieberman refuse to be on a losing ticket....
>> McCain searches far and wide for someone to join him.
You can see the talking point developing though. Everyone on the DNC
mailing list apparently got a email telling them to "LIE, LIE, LIE about
the other candidates turning down the job."
>
> Somehow I don't think these three think McCain is a long shot, especially
> given the fact Obama has lost ground in the polls.
>
>> Sarah Palin , who has nothing to lose agrees to the sacrifice
>
> A high risk move by McCain.
Yes.
JG
>
> But since he represented more of the same, he was absolutely FORCED to make
> a high risk move.
>
>
==============================================================================
TOPIC: McCain chooses Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin for V.P
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.veterans/browse_thread/thread/3cb4f8114537a296?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Aug 29 2008 10:34 am
From: jgarbuz
On Aug 29, 12:31 pm, NefeshYehudi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> McCain sure knows how to pick the cute women.<
Most of the good lookers are Republicans, and the homely Democrats.
Looks and money eagerly go together; ugly and poverty are
uncomfortable companions. Nature is cruel.
==============================================================================
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"soc.veterans"
group.
To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/soc.veterans?hl=en
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.veterans/subscribe?hl=en
To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com?hl=en
--- End Message ---
