-- Vadim Plessky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Sunday, 30 March 2003, 08:27 PM +0400): > On Monday 17 March 2003 19:40, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: > | -- Arnau Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > [...] > | > | If the actual icon files are an issue, you can use pretty much *any* > | icon you can find with ROX (based on the libraries you have installed -- > | i.e., you won't be able to use PNGs if you don't have libpng, etc.). > | Every single item has "Choose Icon..." availale in their menu, and you > | can have an icon for individual items or all items of a class. > | > | You can go to deviantart.com, or even choose icon sets from applications > | you might like (Nautilus, KDE, etc.). > > May I ask you to check > http://svgicons.sourceforge.net > and let me know wether some of icons are ok for you?
ROX, as I've built it, doesn't have SVG support -- Thomas, can you weigh in here on ROX support, current or planned? > I am quite interested to hear input from *minimalist users* (people who like > BlackBox, IceWM, sWM, use ROX, etc.) I've been using Blackbox with ROX for around 15 months now on my 366MHz machine. The combination has led to a speedy and responsive desktop that rivals much of what I've seen on a 1.7GHz Windows machine. (The only area that seems to be slower is audio and video encoding, which are both CPU intensive. Fortunately, I don't do much of that.) I use jpg, png, and gif icons, and do not notice a performace hit. -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://matthew.weierophinney.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] List archives: http://asgardsrealm.net/lurker/splash/index.html Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
