On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 11:29:23PM +0300, Ciprian Popovici wrote: > Yep, and the big fonts are intentional too. I like to be able to read > things easily, same reason I chose serif fonts too (they are easier to read > than sans-serif).
Actually, serif fonts are generally regarded as easier to read only on paper, not on monitors. The user interface guidelines I've come across recommend using sans-serif. The guideline I'm refering to was a video by Tandy Trowers, who used to work at the user interface department for Microsoft. The tiny serif edges don't do much on monitors, which have a relatively low resolution. > Yes, but I'd like to keep a unified convention everywhere on the site. When > the visitor sees something red and underlined, they would instantly know > it's a link and nothing else. But if it's all in one place it's too much noise. It will look both ugly and not serve any real use. Like reading a whole document that is underlined. But up to you. -- .. .. .. Steven Kah Hien Wong (Glutinous) .. .. .. .. .. : E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Mobile: +61 (0) 413 332 005 : ICQ: 3054 4062 : WWW: http://zensaki.com/steven/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] List archives: http://asgardsrealm.net/lurker/splash/index.html Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
