On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Jens Koerner wrote:

> > > I don't see Netwm.hh with blackbox anymore. Am I overlooking something?
> >
> > Okay, I found updates in the bbkeys CVS "nyz's patches for changing netwm
> > to emwh...".
> >
> > I don't see a tarball with this new update yet.
> >
> Never built a tarball from CVS ? Install a cvs program, get cvs/bbkeys,
> strip unneeded directory CVS, run if necessary mk.sh (or similar), again
> strip unneeded (control)directory, and pack your tarball like
> "tar czvf bbkeys-0.9.0beta2.tar.gz bbkeys-0.9.0beta2"
> Where is your problem?

Sorry, I was unclear. I should have said that I am looking for a official
tarball to made available for bbkeys that matches up with the libbt
provided by the soon-to-be-released blackbox.

I am a pkgsrc developer and help maintain packages for many operating
systems. I hope to soon provide a new blackbox in our collection and want
to make sure we have bbkeys updated also. We prefer to not have to provide
our own distfiles and we don't use cvs to build packages because cvs can't
be bootstrapped as easily (as quickly).

By the way, if anyone is reading this thread. It doesn't come with mk.sh.
I did use the latest-and-greatest bbkeys from CVS for my own personal use.
I used:

 aclocal
 autoheader
 automake -a --foreign -i
 autoconf

(before ../configure)

  Jeremy C. Reed
echo 'G014AE824B0-07CC?/JJFFFI?D64CB>D=3C427=>;>6HI2><J' |
tr /-_ :\ Sc-y./ | sed swxw`uname`w

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List archives:  http://asgardsrealm.net/lurker/splash/index.html

Reply via email to