perhaps trying the following will cause the sh to exit:
sleep 1 && exec bbapp1 &
sleep 2 && exec bbapp2 &
.
.
.
exec blackbox
i think i was having the same prob you were, and iirc, that fixed it for
me.
Ben Tracy wrote:
>
> hmm.. wouldn't this do it?
>
> bbapp1 &
> sleep 1
> bbapp2 &
> sleep 1
> etc.
>
> If they get out of order, then increase the sleep lengths.
>
> Ben
>
> On Fri, 26 May 2000, "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" wrote:
> > On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 09:11:29PM +0200, Marcus Hagn wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > this has not directly anything to do with blackbox.
> > > but in the recent memory usage hype i also took a
> > > closer look into my ps list and i saw some strange things.
> > >
> > > my .xinitrc file looks something like
> > >
> > > sleep 1 && bbapp1 &
> > > sleep 2 && bbapp2 &
> > > .
> > > .
> > > .
> > > exec blackbox
> > >
> > > if i start my apps without the sleep commandos, these are gone (
> > leaving me
> > > with a scrambled slit :( ). Can sombody explain this to me.
> > Where do these
> > > shells come from. I am a bit clueless.
> > >
> >
> > xinitrc is run by a shell. Every shell command you give it will
> > fork off a new
> > shell.
> >
> > Dunno a better way to do what you want sorry )-:
> >
