Jason Kasper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * [08/04/01 17:07] Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the
> world,
> * Jan Schaumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> walks into mine and says: 

> > In addition, there's a little problem compiling with gcc-3.0:

> Excellent, thanks for the input, Jan.  Gotta love helpful compilers.
> =:)  I won't have a chance to look at this until this evening (hanging
> ceiling fans, woohoo), but do you know--would this change to
> accomodate
> gcc-3 break things for previous versions?


Compiling the modified version with g++-2.95 worked fine as well.  I
guess it's one of those things that makes people report gcc-3.0 (or
gcc-2.96) to be broken, when in fact they are simply more strict with
respect to standards.

-Jan, re-posting this to the ML

-- 
Jan Schaumann 
http://www.netmeister.org

Reply via email to