Becuase, usually, when it's not under development, after a year or two of stagnation, it starts to become obsolete. Blackbox is awesome, but i doubt i'll want to still be using v61.x two years from now... ...that's just me, though.
On Friday 19 October 2001 23:36, you wrote: > * Eric Christian Carlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Oct 20. 2001 01:08]: > > Hey everyone, just one quick question. Is there currently any > > development goin on in blackbox or have the authors dropped it. I think > > it's awesome but it could be a little bit more stable. It seems like a > > lot of people use it (including myself) but I don't see any signs of > > life on the home page. Looks like we've been at the same version for a > > while. Just wondering. Thanks to anyone who has contributed to this > > awesome window manager. > > Why is it that people think that in order for a project to be successful > in the area it exists, and betweeen the people who encourage it, it by > all means have to be under active development? -- [scott] :: "ein kalter Tod f�r den sprecher von L�gen"
