-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Scott Moynes wrote:

> * Aaron J. Seigo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > some clarification regarding konqi: it isn't a monolithic bloatware app.
> > konqi is a (very small) framework app wherein _every_ _single_ piece is a
> > loaded part that does one thing, does it well (hopefully =), and
> > interoperates with every other part that is loadable. it is very much a
> > tribute to the "multiple small components" concept that makes the UNIX CLI
> > such a dream to use.
> >
> > so it actually doesn't uphold your theory at all and in fact supports the
> > other school of thought.
>
> tongue.in(cheek);
>
> So then just about any modern object-oriented or component based
> application should also be in the UNIX way. Everything from our dear
> blackbox all the way past konqi and mozilla through to Microsoft
> Office. :D

Yea, Office could in fact be seen in this light. It's built of a huge
amount of 'components', 'active x controls' whatever you want to call
them, and each does its own job, and each can be reused :) I think this
argument is becoming rather moot.

xOr
- -- 
I am damn unsatisfied to be killed in this way.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE77Jhy8mPQRGtSu14RAiBdAJ9AGiV+1vsftzrLJGEYhMA0WBaShACfe5Zw
zMAh5SMMe9NQGgTX2+3kKDE=
=lFQV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to