On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 07:42:37 +0100 J.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We all know that Blackbox is wrapped around the fact that it's highly
> minimalistic. This is good. Minimalism is the way every Open Source
> identity should follow. Yet, why should minimalism mean bad design? Even
> though Blackbox is as easy and light like a feather, it doesn't mean that
> the graphics should make one bounce off the land of Blackbox just because
> there's a better-looking option. These days, design is everything. And in
> addition to having Blackbox functioning as light-weight desktop system,
> which it does without question, everyone should focus more on getting the
> light-weight graphics to look as if it was a graphical replacement of sex
> invented in year 4000. Nawamean? =)
>
Well, I've never been more turned on by a windowmanager than by blackbox.
Minimal frames and handles, nice readable labels, soft colours and this baby is hot! ;)
--
mattias �stergren | /"\
compsci student | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
g�vle, sweden | X No HTML in e-mail
http://spikboll.net | / \
