On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:06:35AM -0500, Jan Schaumann wrote: > Derek Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb07,02 10:42, Marco Fioretti wrote: > > > > Head on over to > > > > > > > > http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2002-02-06-010-20-RV-DT-SW > > > And then, aside from that... I'm curious... the author states this: > > > > "Fluxbox also adds a native key grabber to the base functionality it > > inherits from Blackbox. The key grabber gives the ability to not only handle > > keyboard shortcuts for common window manager commands, but it also allows > > sophisticated multi-key sequences to be assigned in a manner similar to > ^^^^^^^^^^ > > Emacs." > > > > Now, considering his false statement regarding the slit, is the keygrabbing > > ability EXACTLY like emacs'? or what? > ^^^^^^^^^^ > > Why would you assume the keybindings are *exactly* as in Emacs, if the > author says they are *similar*? I haven't read the article, but from > what you quoted here, I can't find any false information[1].
There's only 1 piece of false info in there: Window tabs are hardly the only difference, as Fluxbox provides support for KDE and Windowmaker dock applications. This is a little strange, coming from years of Blackbox use, because the lack of docked application support has always been one of its defining features. He spends a whole paragraph (I think the biggest one in teh article) on this, and Blackbox has always (well, for a long time anyways) handles wmaker dock apps just fine. This annoys me to no end, get it right, you know..? Oh well. xOr -- I am damn unsatisfied to be killed in this way.
msg05392/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
