On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 03:27:13AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > On 14-Apr-2002 Matt Wilson wrote: > > Hey, > > I know this has been covered, and I'm probably a bit late, but why did we do > > the > > *empty* thing in empty menus? > > > > Now I actually have to stop and read that one entry, rather than just seeing > > an > > empty menu.. by putting in the *empty*, the menus are no-longer empty... > > > > Ok, that's my moan for today... I love blackbox, and I love what you guys are > > doing > > with it, keep up the awesome work :) > > > > Ok, on the empty thing. Some menus do not have titles, so if they are empty > you get NO notification. > > I am not bound to the current *empty* was added as a test to see how people > felt about it. I know some will like it and others won't.
I'd have to vote for the actual empty menu rather than "*emtpy*". I've gotten accustomed to seeing nothing in the menu when nothing is there. Thanks and keep up the great work, Paul
msg06172/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
