On 20-May-2002 Mr.X wrote: > On 21 May 2002 08:34:12 +1200 > Matt Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I updated, rebuilt, restarted, and tested everything again right >> before I emailed all that stuff. So, yes, *current* cvs. I'm updating >> daily anyhow. >> >> I got college all morning (ie now), but I'll have a look at that stuff >> when I get home, later on. >> >> Matt. > > I'm getting this same behavior (with latest CVS), but only with terms > (aterm, Eterm, etc), and editors that measure their size in character > increments instead of pixel increments. Like how aterm or gvim or nedit > will say 80x25 and REALLY mean 80x25 characters, not 80x25 pixels.
Let's clarify for a moment. What I was referring to is his comment that windows were still not snapping to the edge rather they were slightly covering. I have tried numerous styles and apps and do not see this behaviour. Now, what misbehaviour are you seeing with the clients which use resize increments?
