Yes, I could have been more clear. I'm running 0.65.0alpha9. I can make the change to the beta to see if it is better.
I'm hesitant to report problems, since the software that's giving me problems is licensed in such a way that I doubt any else has access to it.. I know how difficult debugging such a thing would be. :( xOr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 09:15:21AM -0400, Chris Grossmann wrote: > > I have some problems with transient windows that I can't > > duplicate in other window managers. None of them are > > catastrophic, but all are inconvenient. Of course, the > > problems all originate from one particular piece of > > software. Therefore, I feel kind of strange about asking BB > > developers to work on the issues.. > > > > My question is this: > > > > Is the code that handles transient windows pretty static, or > > are there changes going into it? > > > > > > If it's being changed anyway, I'll hold out until it's > > "complete" and see if it helps. If it's static, I should > > probably start doing more research.. > > That depends on the version of blackbox that you are running, what is > it? > The transients in 0.62.1 could be considered 'unfinished', but a lot of > work has gone into supporting them better in CVS. If you are running the > latest beta, or a version directly from CVS, then the transient code is > thought to be working correctly, and any problem reports would be > appreciated. If you could post any problems in the sf.net tracker, it > would help out (http://sf.net/projects/blackboxwm/). > > Thanks, > xOr > -- > I am damn unsatisfied to be killed in this way. -- Chris Grossmann - NEW EMAIL AND WEB ADDRESS BELOW email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.grossmann.us YIM - chris_grossmann_rtp
