I was thinking the same thing. Not to thread crap or anything. I doubt developers would want this sort of information stored in this project, but maybe start a quicksilver-errata project on google code? I'm assuming of course that anything someone would post in this thread would assumed to be public domain. Links could be posted to there and still discussed here of course.
On May 30, 6:21 am, pendolino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > thanks for putting this info up. it will be a good to have a QS > repository but warehousing here long term may not be feasibly. how > about a dedicated quicksilver site, wiki, software hub, etc?
