well, since snow leo, QS is slow on my system and i do not have a large catalog for sure... so if it is not the plist, what then?
On Oct 23, 7:32 am, Eris <[email protected]> wrote: > OS X has been using binary plists since Tiger. Your problems are > probably due to a large catalog. > > On Oct 23, 12:55 am, elspub <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I have been feeling QS slow down, especially as I add triggers, > > actions, make catalog changes, etc., all of which store their info in > > plists. > > > I know that Snow Leopard has changed the way it handles plists to > > using them as compiled binary plists (whereas in previous OS X's you > > could just open a plist in a text editor and read it in essentially > > an .xml format)... > > > So I'm wondering if part of Quicksilver's Snow issues are related to > > the way it handles plists. > > > Can anyone answer this? Am I way off?
