In all honesty though, I think QSB is actually going about things the wrong way. I pimp QS to everybody I know who owns a Mac.
I would rather see QS become a paid app than die. I would easily pay $50 for QS. It's the single most useful program I've ever used. Bryan Ross [email protected] On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Patrick Robertson < [email protected]> wrote: > There are about 3 or 4 of us that are working on QS in our spare time, but > as you said - it's not paid so we can't work full time on it! > > We're mainly concentrating on bug fixing at the moment, and I doubt we'll > get many new enhancements out - but having said that QS is pretty much > feature full already :) > > LB is definitely going to have better support, and be less buggy, but most > of us that use QS use it because we don't like the alternatives (or there's > nothing as good). > > My thoughts are (or what I'm probably gonna do) is continue development on > QS until QSB (Google's version of QS, being developed by the original > developer of QS and others) gets as feature-full as QS then I'll switch to > that. > > I see that being a loooong way away though! > > 2009/12/18 DavidAaron <[email protected]> > > I am not sure, but I got referred to go to LaunchBar (I hope I don't >> get damned to hell for saying that...) but I tried it and I don't like >> it. But a friend told me that QS dev was gone and that LB would be >> better because it's a paid app and it will always have active >> development, blah blah blah... >> >> So that is the question I pose, how active is the development for QS? >> Will it be fossilized in the foreseeable future? >> > >
