Memory is definitely not an issue (4GB here and QS is at about 40mb).
Plus, I don't run any really memory intensive stuff. As far as
clipboard, I don't have the clipboard module activated...

On Jun 14, 3:13 pm, Howard Melman <[email protected]> wrote:
> First thing that comes to mind is memory.  Is there enough system memory (or 
> are you swapping) and is QS using a lot (say something large on the 
> clipboard)?
>
> Howard
>
> On Jun 14, 2010, at 4:12 PM, sclough wrote:
>
>
>
> > Yea, I'd love to know if there's anything that can be done to help
> > it...
>
> > On Jun 14, 1:35 am, huiii <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> i got the same problem since snow leopard, and the same question...
>
> >> On Jun 13, 4:28 pm, sclough <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>> I've noticed periodically when I invoke QS, that there seems to be a
> >>> hesitation for a few seconds before it responds to my input. The
> >>> command window comes up, but it just doesn't respond. For example, if
> >>> I'm activating an application I can invoke QS, type in the characters
> >>> needed, and hit enter to active the app before QS even displays that
> >>> app in the UI. Since QS has learned what I want, I just type and go
> >>> even though I'm not getting any visual feedback. When I do this it
> >>> seems like there's a pause when I hit enter as QS updates the UI to
> >>> display the icon that matches what I typed before it actually launches
> >>> or actives it. Hopefully this makes sense. Anyway, I'm wondering if
> >>> there's anything that can be done to help this? I've thought about
> >>> trying to replace my catalog entirely with spotlight sources in case
> >>> refreshing the catalog is the issue, although I would assume that's
> >>> something done in the background that shouldn't affect the ui. I can't
> >>> think of much else that I could tweak beyond reducing the number of
> >>> catalog items, but my catalog isn't massive (probably around 1,500
> >>> items including address book, files, and everything). Any ideas about
> >>> what's causing this and what I could do to improve performance?

Reply via email to