I've thought about it, and dropped the 'search' altogether. This may not be the best thing if users already have abbreviations for the searches. But when I changed things from Google Search to Search Google this would have messed things up anyway.
Refresh the URL and see what you think :) On Sep 11, 8:08 am, "Kevin C." <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, Patrick! And take your time, of course. This isn't a bug (and > I don't want it to get in the way of auto-updating plugins). > > And I agree, Rob, but the simple list of 25 makes it so easy! And so > easy to impose my views on others. Oh and don't tell anybody, but > before the new list (or maybe just before I realized the new list > existed), I manually went through and narrowed the huge list down to > 40 or so that I could use. That was...character-building. > > On Sep 10, 11:56 pm, Rob McBroom <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sep 10, 2011, at 6:19 PM, Kevin C. wrote: > > > > The new web search format of "SearchGoogle" as opposed to the old > > > "GoogleSearch" is somewhat non-standard as far as Quicksilver goes. > > > Generally, the item in the first pane of the app is a noun: iTunes, > > > Macintosh HD, contact name, etc. "GoogleSearch" fits this: "I'm going > > > to initiate aGooglesearch." "SearchGoogle," on the other hand, does > > > not. (In this line of thinking, actually, just plain "Google" would > > > work the best, now that I think about it…) > > > Maybe “crazy” is using a big pre-defined list of search engines. ;) > > > I just disable the defaults since there are less than a dozen searches I > > will actually use. I add those by hand and call them whatever I want. > > > -- > > Rob McBroom > > <http://www.skurfer.com/>
