Agree. My computing life is much more efficient and enjoyable thanks to QS.
On Oct 27, 7:05 am, Ian Hay <[email protected]> wrote: > just like to echo the thoughts below, being able to use QS properly again is > very cool ! > > On 27 Oct 2011, at 01:02, Adam Merrifield wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 here as well. QS was a part of my brain until Leopard issues eventually > > drove me to find a conglomeration of alternatives to fill the void > > (unsuccessful). I am so thrilled you guys kept it alive, kept it updated, > > cleaned it up and continue to improve it. If it weren't for you guys I > > would never have come back to QS. That void would still be there. > > > You guys rock! > > > Adam Merrifield (out of office) > > seyDoggy vCard: seydoggy.com/vcard > > seyDesign vCard: seydesign.com/vcard > > > On 2011-10-26, at 16:42, Patrick Robertson <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> –Sorry, Jon :) > > >> On 26 October 2011 21:16, Patrick Robertson <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> Thanks for the kind words John, > > >> We all enjoy developing the code, and do it for the exact same reasons > >> you've expressed. > >> Expect another release fairly soon :) > > >> On 26 October 2011 18:47, Jon T <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I just updated to the latest Quicksilver b61 and wanted to take the > >> time to thank all the developers who have spent the time to update > >> this gem of a program. Over the years with each OS upgrade I felt that > >> QS was destined to be abandoned, but am highly relieved that it lives > >> through one more OS cycle. I look forward to following your progress > >> and will keep my fingers crossed for some new and innovative features. > >> Cheers.
