> I haven’t looked at the code, but I think this happens because Quicksilver > asks for the 128x128 icon, or the next best. So for example, if an icon > provides 512x512 and 16x16, but skips everything else in between, the “next > best” ends up being 16x16 which looks terrible when blown up.
Yeah, if I remember correctly, if there is no 128x128 icon available, it uses the next smaller one and scales it up, instead of using the next larger one and scaling it down. It should be the other way around. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quicksilver group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/blacktree-quicksilver?hl=en
