On Jul 20, 2012, at 4:31 PM, Daniel wrote: > A more general solution would be a way of making any set of Catalog scanners > into a separate Catalog. Essentially, a way of maintaing n Catalogs on n > different key sequences. > > That is an absolutely awesome idea (something I've thought of before, > myself). +1 if there's anyone interested in implementing.
So why is this useful? I'm sure there's something I'm not understanding. It strikes me as "I want to find this stuff but not have it in the catalog, well put it in the catalog". What's the issue with having one catalog with everything? When you want to find something it's still in there. Just type a little more the first few times and then QS learns. Are you browsing the results list rather than continuing to type to find something in it? Howard -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quicksilver group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/blacktree-quicksilver?hl=en
